ACC Update - August 2, 2006 (Plain Text Version)

View Graphical Version


CLO’s Role in Financial Compliance

CLO’s Role in Financial Compliance:  Trusted Legal Advisor, Advocate & Leader 
Insights of Michael Fricklas, CLO Viacom Inc.


“The relationship with the financial side of the business is one of the most important relationships a General Counsel has, and developing an open and trusting relationship is fundamental to success,” explains Michael Fricklas, Executive Vice President and General Counsel for Viacom.  As General Counsel, Fricklas leads by example and spearheads initiatives within the company to develop strong processes for legal support for financial compliance and internal controls.  In addition, Fricklas plays a key leadership role within the broader legal community on the critical and related issue of ever-expanding auditor requests for information and the client’s (and counsel’s) need to preserve the attorney-client privilege and work product protections.  Highlighted below are perspectives shared by Fricklas on practices chief legal officers can implement within their companies and how they can strengthen the role of law departments in their company’s financial compliance processes and their relationship to corporate governance and brand integrity.  

BUILDING TRUST AND EFFECTIVE PROCESSES

“Internal and outside auditors heavily rely on General Counsel and in-house lawyers when certifying the books and financial statements.  While our participation in the audit process is increasing, our finance role is not limited to this function.  We implement a variety of ‘preventive’ practices that help build trust and support the integrity in our financial processes, and this reinforces the value and important role lawyers play,” shares Fricklas.  Among these practices are:  

•    Be ‘in-the-loop’.  In-house lawyers need to be on top of the latest finance information in the company so that they may proactively help spot issues and ask questions during internal discussions. They should also be involved in the process to help identify legal issues and ensure comfort with external statements by senior management to the investment community.  Fricklas notes that his law department and senior management have established practices that help enable the law department to be so familiar with the numbers that they can provide advice on-the-spot, or in advance of company announcements or management’s speaking engagements.

•    Establish collaborative relationships with company financial staff and auditors that foster information-sharing with minimal intrusion.  Fricklas believes that, under most circumstances, auditors don’t need access to privileged documents, and companies can find an alternative way to support accounting positions without risking the attorney-client and work product privileges.  As an example, Fricklas notes that business personnel can focus on fact-based reasons supporting financial positions rather than focusing on advice of counsel since most circumstances will necessarily involve fact-based decision-making as justification for a given course of action.

•    Hire lawyers who are financially literate and provide tools to support continued learning.  In-house lawyers working with inside financial personnel and outside auditors need to stay current on significant accounting rule changes and related financial rules to that they can stay plugged in to the entire set of accounting processes and ask informed questions.  But even more fundamental, they need to have a good grasp of how the company’s business and finances are connected, which many lawyers don’t spend time focusing on.  Within the Viacom law department, lawyers attend an internal company ‘corporate college,’ and appropriate lawyers receive advanced training that supports their relationship with auditors and company financial managers. 

•    Communicate with the Board.  In-house lawyers should brief the full Board on significant litigation, and Fricklas attends all meetings of the Board’s Audit Committee, including executive sessions of the committee during which outside auditors are not present.  There is also an executive session attended only by the Committee and himself as General Counsel.

•    Help structure internal controls processes and certify the process.   At Viacom, in-house lawyers are deeply involved in quarter-end review processes to help ensure the reliability of divisional certifications of financial information submitted to Corporate.  Since the role of in-house lawyers focuses on providing assistance and process support, select in-house lawyers working with the business divisions certify their involvement with the process and whether it was followed. 

•    Separate facts and legal opinions in internal investigation reports.  Consider preparing separate legal and factual components of any investigation report prepared so that the factual information may be shared with outsiders, including auditors, while preserving legal privileges and protections for the report that contains legal advice and mental impressions.

•    Meet with outside auditors and have open/honest discussions.  Lawyers take the lead in discussing the business impact of legal matters in a manner that does not constitute waiver, including the likely financial impact and the broader operational impacts of legal affairs. 

•    Stay involved in the outside auditor inquiry letter process.  The law department should be engaged with their auditor to help identify which outside law firms may have information on material matters and should therefore provide written responses to audit inquiry letters. 

Read the rest of this article


CLO’s Role in Financial Compliance:  Trusted Legal Advisor, Advocate & Leader 
Insights of Michael Fricklas, CLO Viacom Inc.


“The relationship with the financial side of the business is one of the most important relationships a General Counsel has, and developing an open and trusting relationship is fundamental to success,” explains Michael Fricklas, Executive Vice President and General Counsel for Viacom.  As General Counsel, Fricklas leads by example and spearheads initiatives within the company to develop strong processes for legal support for financial compliance and internal controls.  In addition, Fricklas plays a key leadership role within the broader legal community on the critical and related issue of ever-expanding auditor requests for information and the client’s (and counsel’s) need to preserve the attorney-client privilege and work product protections.  Highlighted below are perspectives shared by Fricklas on practices chief legal officers can implement within their companies and how they can strengthen the role of law departments in their company’s financial compliance processes and their relationship to corporate governance and brand integrity.  

BUILDING TRUST AND EFFECTIVE PROCESSES

“Internal and outside auditors heavily rely on General Counsel and in-house lawyers when certifying the books and financial statements.  While our participation in the audit process is increasing, our finance role is not limited to this function.  We implement a variety of ‘preventive’ practices that help build trust and support the integrity in our financial processes, and this reinforces the value and important role lawyers play,” shares Fricklas.  Among these practices are:  

•    Be ‘in-the-loop’.  In-house lawyers need to be on top of the latest finance information in the company so that they may proactively help spot issues and ask questions during internal discussions. They should also be involved in the process to help identify legal issues and ensure comfort with external statements by senior management to the investment community.  Fricklas notes that his law department and senior management have established practices that help enable the law department to be so familiar with the numbers that they can provide advice on-the-spot, or in advance of company announcements or management’s speaking engagements.

•    Establish collaborative relationships with company financial staff and auditors that foster information-sharing with minimal intrusion.  Fricklas believes that, under most circumstances, auditors don’t need access to privileged documents, and companies can find an alternative way to support accounting positions without risking the attorney-client and work product privileges.  As an example, Fricklas notes that business personnel can focus on fact-based reasons supporting financial positions rather than focusing on advice of counsel since most circumstances will necessarily involve fact-based decision-making as justification for a given course of action.

•    Hire lawyers who are financially literate and provide tools to support continued learning.  In-house lawyers working with inside financial personnel and outside auditors need to stay current on significant accounting rule changes and related financial rules to that they can stay plugged in to the entire set of accounting processes and ask informed questions.  But even more fundamental, they need to have a good grasp of how the company’s business and finances are connected, which many lawyers don’t spend time focusing on.  Within the Viacom law department, lawyers attend an internal company ‘corporate college,’ and appropriate lawyers receive advanced training that supports their relationship with auditors and company financial managers. 

•    Communicate with the Board.  In-house lawyers should brief the full Board on significant litigation, and Fricklas attends all meetings of the Board’s Audit Committee, including executive sessions of the committee during which outside auditors are not present.  There is also an executive session attended only by the Committee and himself as General Counsel.

•    Help structure internal controls processes and certify the process.   At Viacom, in-house lawyers are deeply involved in quarter-end review processes to help ensure the reliability of divisional certifications of financial information submitted to Corporate.  Since the role of in-house lawyers focuses on providing assistance and process support, select in-house lawyers working with the business divisions certify their involvement with the process and whether it was followed. 

•    Separate facts and legal opinions in internal investigation reports.  Consider preparing separate legal and factual components of any investigation report prepared so that the factual information may be shared with outsiders, including auditors, while preserving legal privileges and protections for the report that contains legal advice and mental impressions.

•    Meet with outside auditors and have open/honest discussions.  Lawyers take the lead in discussing the business impact of legal matters in a manner that does not constitute waiver, including the likely financial impact and the broader operational impacts of legal affairs. 

•    Stay involved in the outside auditor inquiry letter process.  The law department should be engaged with their auditor to help identify which outside law firms may have information on material matters and should therefore provide written responses to audit inquiry letters.

Read the rest of this article.


Annual Meeting Offers Expanded Programming for CLOs

ACC’s Annual Meeting is offering more options than ever before—just for CLOs.  A sell-out every year, ACC’s CLO Club is a sophisticated networking forum that hosts peer-to-peer discussion groups targeted to the unique executive practice, management, and benchmarking needs of chief legal officers in both small and larger department settings, across all industries. This year’s CLO Club will focus on identifying key challenges and best practices for such topics as law department metrics and working with the board of directors. The Club’s interactive discussion groups enable meaningful one-on-one dialogue and networking based on your department’s size: full-group follow-up allows for larger benchmarking opportunities against practices of all CLOs present at the meetings. Participation is strictly limited to chief legal officers.

A new addition to this year’s meeting is the CLO Executive Leadership Series. This track will focus on the high-level demands general counsel face on a daily basis, including protecting privilege, global compliance and protecting your law department before a corporate failure.

Visit the annual meeting website to check out these and the over 120 other sessions being presented in San Diego this October 23-25. Register by September 8th to save money and reserve your place.

  [return to top]

Build Your Department with ACC’s In-house Jobline

Looking for the next, great member of your legal team? Look no further than ACC’s In-house Jobline—the destination for corporate counsel career opportunities. In 2005, In-house Jobline delivered these results:

•    5,190 resumes open for inspection
•    12,338 attorneys registered as job seekers
•    40,291 job applications filed
•    444 average times a job was viewed    

ACC members receive a 20% discount on all job posting fees and resume searches.  And if you're looking for your next job, searching the job listings and posting your resume is easy and always free. Right now there are 925 open corporate counsel positions and a career center filled with helpful information and advice. Log on to In-house Jobline today.


 [return to top]

ACC’s Latest Advocacy Efforts

• ACC filed an amicus brief in In re Teleglobe Communications Corporation.  In the case, Teleglobe, a subsidiary of BCE Inc., is suing BCE and demanding access to attorney-client privileged communications between BCE and its in-house and outside counsel on the grounds that BCE’s in-house counsel previously represented both the parents and subs on a variety of issues.
• ACC filed comments on Proposed Rule 502 concerning limited waiver protections for organizational entities against third party discovery of attorney-client privilege and work product protected documents and communications with the Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Read ACC's comments.
• Federal judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the Southern District of New York excoriated US attorneys for violating the Constitutional rights of former KPMG partners by pressuring KPMG to cut off legal fees provided under the terms of their partnership agreements. ACC filed an amicus brief in the case protesting the government’s prosecutorial tactics, and stating that the Justice Department’s reliance on the Thompson Memorandum leads to the inappropriate coercion of corporate and individual defendant rights and distorts the equitable operation of our justice system.  Kaplan agreed, saying that the government has let “its zeal get in the way of its judgment.”  Read Judge Kaplan’s ruling.
• In the Tenth Circuit case, In re Qwest Communications International Inc., the company had provided privileged information to the SEC under the condition of a limited waiver agreement.  But when a third party demanded access to the protected information, the Tenth Circuit ordered Qwest to produce the files.
Morrison v. Board of Law Examiners of the State of North Carolina concerns an in-house lawyer barred from practice in the state because he had previously practiced in California.


 [return to top]